[Yum] Where is this Mysterious RHEL5 Repos Defined?
Seth Vidal
skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Mon Sep 15 14:12:35 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 10:11 -0400, Swiftmind wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am working on some systems running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. I am
> compiling the latest RH kernel with some custom changes on a bunch of
> these machines. I want to use yum to update the applications as well,
> but I ran into a problem with repositories. It seems my system is the
> only one with three RH repositories that contain RPMs I need to
> compile the kernels. So far yum on two other systems I worked on do
> not have these repositories. I am trying to figure out how my system
> knows about these two extra repos. Here is my information below.
>
> [root at Huskies etc]# uname -r
> 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5
> [root at Huskies etc]# uname -m
> x86_64
>
> [root at Huskies etc]# rpm -qa | grep yum
> yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5
> yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-2.el5
> yum-rhn-plugin-0.5.3-12.el5_2.9
> yum-3.2.8-9.el5_2.1
>
> [root at Huskies etc]# yum repolist all
> Loading "rhnplugin" plugin
> repo id repo name status
> rhel-debuginfo Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5Client - x86_6
> disabled
> rhel-x86_64-client-5 None
> enabled
> rhel-x86_64-client-s None
> enabled
> rhel-x86_64-client-w None
> enabled
>
> =====================================
> Here is a system I am trying to update.
>
> [root at nebulous yum.repos.d]# rpm -qa | grep yum
> yum-updatesd-0.9-2.el5
> yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-2.el5
> yum-rhn-plugin-0.5.3-12.el5_2.9
> yum-3.2.8-9.el5_2.1
>
> [root at nebulous yum.repos.d]# uname -r
> 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5
> [root at Huskies etc]# uname -m
> x86_64
>
> [root at nebulous yum.repos.d]# yum repolist all
> Loading "rhnplugin" plugin
> repo id repo name status
> rhel-debuginfo Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5Client - x86_6
> disabled
> rhel-x86_64-client-5 None
>
> =====================================
> As you can see the "rhel-x86_64-client-s" and "rhel-x86_64-client-w"
> are missing. Where are these repos being defined?
>
yum-rhn-plugin defines them on the fly. They never get an explicit
definition in a .repo file.
If you'd like to see this changed for the future I'd encourage you to
file a bug in rh's bugzilla and/or contact your TAM, if you have one.
-sv
More information about the Yum
mailing list