[Yum] Duplicated packages.
Shlomi Levi
lshl.shlomi at gmail.com
Tue Jun 13 22:28:44 UTC 2006
10x to you all,
'rpm -e ' did solve it all. Now how can I debug and see what went wrong with
the %post/%postun scripts (or even direct yum to be more verbose during the
update - since I understood that the failure was during update not cleanup)?
10x,
Shlomi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yum-bounces at lists.dulug.duke.edu
> [mailto:yum-bounces at lists.dulug.duke.edu] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:29 PM
> To: Yellowdog Updater, Modified
> Subject: Re: [Yum] Duplicated packages.
>
>
> On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:05 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:36:32PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 21:20 +0200, Shlomi Levi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Somehow I got to the situation that yum reports both glibc.i686
> > > > 2.4-4 glibc.i686 2.4-8
> > > > As installed on my system. How do I remove the specific
> 2.4-4 from my
> > > > system?
> > > > Not that important to remove the package as to fix
> yum's repository.
> > >
> > > Broken %post/%postun scripts can lead to such situations,
> eg it's a
> > > packaging problem typically. 'rpm -e glibc-2.4-4' to fix.
> >
> > If the %post/%postun scripts are busted, then running `rpm -e
> > glibc-2.4-4` will execute them and fail again. You will need to do
> > `rpm --noscripts -e glibc-2.4-4` to make sure that any of
> the broken
> > scripts aren't run.
>
> Yup, to be sure you'll need --noscripts. OTOH quite often in
> these cases it's the upgrade that's broken, not the remove
> case. And if you need --noscripts it's usually a good idea to
> look at the scripts to see what was *supposed* to happen on
> the upgrade and what part of it possibly didn't happen
> because of the failure.
>
> - Panu -
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yum mailing list
> Yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
>
More information about the Yum
mailing list