[Yum] Re: more chickens - but which egg?

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:47:20PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > There is/was nothing broken at ATrpms. Being trigger-happy doesn't
> > make you look smart.
> 
> Uh, I wasn't making a comment about you,

Commenting on my work is commenting on me.

> so please refrain from making comments about me--we aren't pals
> enough for such things.

Indeed, and that should work in both directions, right?
So let me ask you to investigate before make false statements. Thanks.

> I was saying that when it's impossible for yum to figure out
> dependency issues (a situation commonly arising from broken
> repositories, of which there are plenty, especially when mixed and
> matched), trying to program in some fuzzy logic to acommodate for
> configuration and/or repository error will result in fuzzy systems.

Yes, nicely worded FUD and still completely unrelated to the issue,
still implying that there is a "configuration and/or repository
error". There is/was no broken repo/configuration involved in
this. Period.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-January/msg01826.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144376
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140832
https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378
https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=379
http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=288
http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=289

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum/attachments/20050404/e1f92704/attachment-0001.pgp