[Yum] Yum replacing x86_64 packages with i386.

[Jeff Johnson]

On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:32:47PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 12:30 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, seth vidal wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 12:08 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, seth vidal wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 11:38 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > > > > > I noticed the same thing. I imagine everyone with x86_64 had it happen to 
> > > > > > them.
> > > > > > I have exactarch=1 in mine.
> > > > > What version of yum is this?
> > > > 2.1.11
> > > > fedora core 3, release version
> > > Can you test this on yum 2.1.12?
> > 
> > Here's what I get on yum 2.1.11:
> > 
> > Other Transactions:
> >   Obsoleting: boost.i386 0:1.31.0-9 with boost.i386 0:1.32.0-1.fc3
> >   Obsoleting: boost.x86_64 0:1.31.0-9 with boost.i386 0:1.32.0-1.fc3
> >   Obsoleting: boost-devel.x86_64 0:1.31.0-9 with boost.i386 0:1.32.0-1.fc3
> > 
> 
> ooooooooooookay
> 
> so boost obsoletes boost?
> 
> I'm going to go cry now. Thanks.
> 

/me hands skvidal a hanky. snuffle up old boy! multilib is almost
in production. wait for some extra special i386 on ia64 pain however,
then perhaps clear sailing for a bit.

BTW, qemu-arm WORKSFORME, underneath rpmbuild and rpm next agenda item.
arch needs to die! die! die!

;-)

73 de Jeff

-- 
Jeff Johnson	ARS N3NPQ
jbj at redhat.com (jbj at jbj.org)
Chapel Hill, NC