[Yum] identical dependency loop exceeded

[seth vidal]

> Just out of curiosity, why 5?  If state n+1 (S_{n+1}) depends only on
> S_{n} and nothing else, then doesn't 
> 
>   S_{n+1} == S_{n}
> 
> imply that 
> 
>   S_{m} == S_{n}   for all  m > n?
> 
> If that's the case,t then I would expect a single step with no change
> to be enough.

the reports are weird. I've had occasions where the type of resolution
steps will change in between for no obvious reason.

5 seemed about average for what I could trust w/no change.

-sv