[Yum] Re: yum] Survey of Use
Jim Wildman
jim at rossberry.com
Sat Oct 25 02:37:04 UTC 2003
That would work as long as I can script it (ie, use it non
interactively). That way I could use yum to tell me when the box was
ready to be patched/updated, rather than just that it needed to be (as
in check-updates).
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, seth vidal wrote:
>
> so let me make sure I understand what this entails:
>
> you need to run yum with a '--what would you do if' parameter - and if
> it say what things it would need to do to update. Is that right?
>
> I was looking at the yum download-only patches and the one thing I don't
> like is they all seem like overkill.
>
> What if there was a more-simple yum download-only mechanism?
>
> What if it were a second, optional, y/n check AFTER the packages were
> downloaded.
>
> So: in default mode nothing changes.
>
> maybe you add a -n (like was suggested by Miguel earlier today) that is,
> essentially an additional check.
>
> yum update
> download headers, etc
> computes dependencies
> ask you if it's ok to do stuff
> downloads and gpg checks packages
> asks you again.
>
> If it was done that way it's:
> 1. a trivial amount of code
> 2. not just a download-only mechanism but an easy way for people to be
> MORE careful about installs.
>
> It seems like that would get you the set of things you need, or at least
> part of them.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -sv
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yum mailing list
> Yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE jim at rossberry.com
http://www.rossberry.com
More information about the Yum
mailing list