[Yum] A couple of problems and RFE for Yum
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Tue Oct 21 19:17:27 UTC 2003
> That COULD be atomic, but it may or may not be worth it. If I
> understand correctly, you currently do this:
>
> 1) write to .newheaders
> 2) rename headers to .oldheaders
> 3) rename .newheaders to headers
>
> If you instead do
>
> 1) write to .newheaders
> 2) COPY headers to .oldheaders
> 3) rename .newheaders to headers
the copy operation could take forever and a day is my concern.
and in that time, depending on what changed on the repo, the headers are
out of date to the rpms.
> Then it should be atomic. That's a significantly heavier operation,
> though.
and you'd have to remove headers at some point.
> Another alternative is:
>
> 1) write to .newheaders
> 2) HARD LINK headers to .oldheaders
> 3) rename .newheaders to headers
>
> That's efficient, but requires hard links :)
which not all filesystems have, right.
-sv
More information about the Yum
mailing list