[Yum] yum and multi architectures ???

[seth vidal]

>  
> > I would say yes based on what the athlon -> i386 say.
> > 
> > And if that's true can I look through this list, grab things where the
> > line ends in noarch and call those the "base classes" - doing a quick
> > grep of the one on my system that gets me: 
> <snip>
> > but then there is ppc and ppc64 which appear to not support noarch
> > packages. Is that an endian issue?
> 
> I cannot answer authoritatively, but almost certainly this is 
> a typographical omission.  A bugzilla may be in order to 
> clarify this.
> 

ah -ha.

found it.

ppc -> rs6000 -> noarch.

so all the groups are taken care of in some sense or another.

ok - then if I build from the noarch matches UP then that might be the
best way to make sure the list is consistent.

I'll work on this later tonight b/c, while it's not critical for most
people, it's mildly interesting.

Also There are 2-4 items I'd like to port back into yum 0.9.X and make
another release there.

thanks,

-sv

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum/attachments/20030218/197bbaee/attachment-0001.pgp