[Yum] traceback encountered
Michael Stenner
mstenner at phy.duke.edu
Sat Sep 7 14:56:31 UTC 2002
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 09:08:26AM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Connie Sieh wrote:
>
> > As long as we are talking about the first pass to get the headers. I have
> > seen it just stop alot. I installed yum on my system at home. It has a
> > cable modem. Yum would download a few headers and then stop. I would
> > restart it and it would get a few more. I resorted to getting them via
> > ncftp.
> >
> > I was thinking that we might have to package up the headers as a rpm and
> > install it when we install yum. This will thus seed the cache and yum
> > will then only have to get new headers.
>
> Absolutely fabulous idea -- I was thinking something similar but didn't
> think of it being a "pre" rpm, just a tarball. I also run installs from
> home over DSL and the system I borked was a DSL install. It is a heck
> of a lot easier (and faster) to install just one big file than a lot of
> little files and just do the updates.
>
> The rpm (or tarball) could probably be generated at the same time as the
> headers themselves, by the same script.
To take this one step further... yum could detect whether it should
get them all separtely, or just download the tarball. That way, after
a fresh install or a "clean headers" it would just say "oh... I don't
have _any_ headers. Let's just get the tarball". This wouldn't be
hard, would it, Seth?
It seems that a tarball is probably more logical. What would the
header-rpm name be? What would the version be? What about
header-rpms from two different repositories? rpm comes with too much
baggage for this application IMHO.
-Michael
--
Michael Stenner Office Phone: 919-660-2513
Duke University, Dept. of Physics mstenner at phy.duke.edu
Box 90305, Durham N.C. 27708-0305
More information about the Yum
mailing list