[Yum-devel] Pylint errors

Seth Vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Fri Apr 30 19:13:29 UTC 2010



On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Mike Bonnet wrote:

> On 04/30/2010 02:40 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Mike Bonnet wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this fall through is on purpose, but I know who would know.
>>>>> I'll ask spot or dgilmore.
>>>>
>>>> I asked dgilmore he said:
>>>> [13:59] <dgilmore> skvidal: there both right
>>>> [13:59] <tibbs> Hmm, OK.
>>>> [13:59] <skvidal> dgilmore: seriously?
>>>> [14:00] <dgilmore> skvidal: yep
>>>> [14:00] <skvidal> ooooooookie doke
>>>> [14:00] <dgilmore> skvidal: sparcv9 -> sparcv9v ->sparc64 ->sparc64v
>>>> [14:00] <dgilmore> skvidal: sparcv9 -> sparc64
>>>> [14:00] <dgilmore> depending on the hardware
>>>>
>>>> so - leave them as is - so we can properly traverse them.
>>>
>>> Isn't the second entry just going to overwrite the first?
>>>
>>>>>> test = {"sparc64v": "sparc64", "sparc64v": "sparcv9v"}
>>>>>> test
>>> {'sparc64v': 'sparcv9v'}
>>>
>>> Looks like you need to pick one.
>>
>> do you have a preference? :)
>
> If the dict is trying to create a "most powerful/modern to least
> powerful/modern" ordering, I'd suggest this:
>
> # sparc
> "sparc64v": "sparc64",
> "sparc64": "sparcv9v",
> "sparcv9v": "sparcv9",
> "sparcv9": "sparcv8",
> "sparcv8": "sparc",
> "sparc": "noarch",
>
> Assuming sparc64 ≥ sparcv9v, which is what the conversation with
> dgilmore seems to imply.

Except I don't think you can do sparc64-> sparcv9v
I think you can only do sparc64v -> sparcv9v

but I don't actually KNOW that.

-sv


More information about the Yum-devel mailing list