[Yum-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Don't integrate negative pkgnames with provides, probably fine but...

James Antill james at fedoraproject.org
Mon Apr 12 17:46:24 UTC 2010


On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 13:07 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:

> Is our memory footprint changing with these changes?

 I assume it's getting a little bigger, to hold the set()s ... but all
the data in the sets is already in core, so it shouldn't be a
significant hit.
 I haven't measured it though.



More information about the Yum-devel mailing list