[Yum-devel] [PATCHES] Repository with fixes and new operations test frame work

[Florian Festi]

seth vidal wrote:
> okay - I'm looking at these patches (thanks to jbowes for the git help)
> and I'm still seeing FakeRpmSack and the stub installed() in there. I
> thought we decided that doing it that way was not all that helpful and
> it would be better to implement it as exists() in PackageSackBase and
> get around that?

I stick with that because it was the less invasive way of getting things up 
and running. exists() is a be bit generic IMHO. But if we want to move that 
way I can provide a patch if no one else wants to do it (should be quite 
trivial). On the other hand I see no reason why that should block anything.

Florian