[Yum-devel] [PATCH/RFC] Follow arch a bit better with obsoletes

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 21:28 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 20:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 20:43 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > foo.noarch won't obsolete bar.i386 only if there's also a foo.i386.  Now
> > > for dinner.
> > 
> > so isn't this a non-starter, then? If we don't let noarch ->arch and
> > arch->noarch obsoletes then we'll be regressing vs current behavior.
> 
>  I think Jeremy's explanation had too many negatives:

okay - I got it now. Thank you.


-sv