[Yum-devel] [PATCH] remove RPMDBPackageSack.installed()
Panu Matilainen
pmatilai at laiskiainen.org
Thu Oct 4 10:46:18 UTC 2007
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>
>> The problem with installed() is just that it's the wrong term for this -
>> make it exists() and it'll make sense for all the package sack types.
>> Whether a package is installed or not is just a question whether it exists
>> in rpmdb or not, if you want to keep API compat just make rpmdb.installed()
>> a wrapper for exists().
> Sound like a good idea, it still keeps the api simple.
>
>> Somewhat related, IMO the installed() method belongs to the package, not
>> sack object. So something like
>>
>> for pkg in installable:
>> if self.rpmdb.installed(po=pkg):
>> # do stuff
>>
>> would become
>>
>> for pkg in installable:
>> if pkg.installed():
>> # do stuff
>>
>> ..but that's another story, dunno how feasible it'd be within yum currently
>> (sorry I haven't been paying that much attention lately)
> Sound like a great idea, but can be tricky to implement.
> a YumInstalledPackage know it is installed, but a YumAvailablePackage dont
> know if it is installed, I know it is available in a repo, but it dont know
> if it is installed on the system.
Yup, the package object would have to know about rpmdb then which is
probably not that clean. A simple solution would be to move the
installed() method to a higher level object that knows about rpmdb, such
as YumBase. Basically
class YumBase:
...
def installed(self, po):
return self.rpmdb.exists(po)
and the above example would become
for pkg in installable:
if self.installed(po):
# ... do stuff
- Panu -
More information about the Yum-devel
mailing list