hg and branches (Re: [Yum-devel] [Patch] Resolver Performance and Correctness)
Charlie Brady
charlieb-yum-devel at budge.apana.org.au
Thu Jun 7 17:37:04 UTC 2007
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> I have tried bot hg and git, hg seams easier to use at first look, but tools
> like Cogito[1] makes git easier to use.
> both ones will be fine with me. What troubles me a little, is the warning
> Jesse[2] sent about hg.
>
> Tim
> [1] : http://git.or.cz/cogito/
> [2]: https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum-devel/2007-May/003630.html
Quoting:
However, yum makes heavy use of branches. In my experiences, branching
with Mercurial is not exactly a fun prospect.
Can someone qualify what "yum makes heavy use of branches" means?
AIUI, hg doesn't really need to elegantly deal with lots of branching. You
fork a clone of the repo, then merge patch sets from one to the other as
you wish.
More information about the Yum-devel
mailing list