[Yum-devel] [Patch] Resolver Performance and Correctness

[James Antill]

On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 10:57 -0400, seth vidal wrote:

> I'll say what I've continued to say:
>  Which one is going to be the 'winner' git or hg? I've looked at both
> and for yum's purposes they appear to be indistinguishable.
> 
> So, what's the preference these days? Are the cool kids using git or hg?
> 
> I'm going to go read the cvs->$scm docs and see which annoys me the
> least.

 For what it's worth I recently moved my personal development from Arch
to GIT, mainly because it seemed obvious to me that it was going to win
the SCM war. Another factor was that GIT has Tk, Qt and gtk+ history
viewers available for it in Fedora.
 I was also pleasantly surprised about how much nicer/faster it was than
Arch.

 Saying all that ... having mercurial instead of CVS would still be a
significant upgrade, IMO.

-- 
James Antill <jantill at redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/attachments/20070606/6f414cf0/attachment.pgp