[Yum-devel] Re: [yum-cvs] yum-metadata-parser db.c, 1.8, 1.9 db.h, 1.4, 1.5 package.h, 1.2, 1.3 xml-parser.c, 1.7, 1.8
seth vidal
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Apr 11 06:19:24 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [Yum-devel] Re: [yum-cvs] yum-metadata-parser db.c, 1.8, 1.9 db.h, 1.4, 1.5 package.h, 1.2, 1.3 xml-parser.c, 1.7, 1.8
- Next message: [Yum-devel] Re: [yum-cvs] yum-metadata-parser db.c, 1.8, 1.9 db.h, 1.4, 1.5 package.h, 1.2, 1.3 xml-parser.c, 1.7, 1.8
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 20:06 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:30 -0400, James Bowes wrote:
> > build_* and time_* values are stored as ints, rather than text, and
> > checksum_value has been dropped, as this is the same value as pkgId.
>
> Not that I really think there are users of checksum_value directly, but
> does it make sense to do the attached just in case there are? Given
> that we're already looking in the dict, it shouldn't add any real
> overhead.
>
yah, probably just for completeness.
-sv
- Previous message: [Yum-devel] Re: [yum-cvs] yum-metadata-parser db.c, 1.8, 1.9 db.h, 1.4, 1.5 package.h, 1.2, 1.3 xml-parser.c, 1.7, 1.8
- Next message: [Yum-devel] Re: [yum-cvs] yum-metadata-parser db.c, 1.8, 1.9 db.h, 1.4, 1.5 package.h, 1.2, 1.3 xml-parser.c, 1.7, 1.8
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Yum-devel
mailing list