[Yum-devel] a lot of api breaking, I think

[Tim Lauridsen]

Paul Nasrat wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:57 -0500, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>   
>> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 09:29 -0500, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>>     
>>> I like 3. best, what about change po.repoid to return po.repo.id
>>> directly by adding a __get__ method to the package object, like it is
>>> done in the Option Classes.
>>>
>>>       
>> Or something like this should do the job.
>>     
>
> I'd rather see things like this as patches if at all possible.  Maybe
> you could send a proposed patch to list marked as [Patch] (as I've been
> doing) for review.
>
> Paul
Hi Paul.

You are right patches is very nice to try things out, but the repo 
object is not in PackageObject's yet, so a patch won't work yet.
I was just sharing my thoughts about  how it could be  done.

Tim
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/attachments/20060131/8339d866/attachment.htm