[Yum-devel] packagesack/package objects

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 23:14 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 22:11 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > Essentially we'd be getting rid of self.rpmdb and replacing it with a
> > rpmdbPackageSack - which is derived from a base packagesack object.
> [snip]
> > I'll be away from email tomorrow but this should leave a place for
> > discussion for a bit.
> 
> It makes some sense, but it's going to cause a lot of dependent code to
> have to churn which I'm less thrilled about :-/
> 

If we're going to fix things we have to break api and if we're going to
do it - now is the time.


-sv