[Yum-devel] packagesack/package objects

[Jeremy Katz]

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 22:11 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> Essentially we'd be getting rid of self.rpmdb and replacing it with a
> rpmdbPackageSack - which is derived from a base packagesack object.
[snip]
> I'll be away from email tomorrow but this should leave a place for
> discussion for a bit.

It makes some sense, but it's going to cause a lot of dependent code to
have to churn which I'm less thrilled about :-/

Jeremy