[Yum-devel] the plan

[Tim Lauridsen]

seth vidal wrote:
>> So, to ask a stupid question
>>
>> Why not call the hypothetical 2.5.3 that we know we'll need 2.6.0
>> instead and then move forward with more breakage in 2.7.x?
>>
>> Otherwise, we're going to have a lot of coordination to do for Fedora
>> land if we want to push anything newer than we ship in FC5 to push
>> updates for other things dependent on the yum API.  
>>
>>     
>
> Sounds fair to me, actually. What do other folks think? 2.5.3 becomes
> 2.6.0 and maybe we change major numbers for the next big release and go
> to 2.9 -> 3.0?
>
> Then it would be CLEAR that there is no api compat.
>
>   
It make perfect sense, even i can understand that big things will happen 
:-)))).

2.9 -> 3.0 is the way to go.

Tim Lauridsen
Yumex Developer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/attachments/20060218/70000f63/attachment.htm