[Yum-devel] the plan

[seth vidal]

> So, to ask a stupid question
> 
> Why not call the hypothetical 2.5.3 that we know we'll need 2.6.0
> instead and then move forward with more breakage in 2.7.x?
> 
> Otherwise, we're going to have a lot of coordination to do for Fedora
> land if we want to push anything newer than we ship in FC5 to push
> updates for other things dependent on the yum API.  
> 

Sounds fair to me, actually. What do other folks think? 2.5.3 becomes
2.6.0 and maybe we change major numbers for the next big release and go
to 2.9 -> 3.0?

Then it would be CLEAR that there is no api compat.


-sv