[Yum-devel] [PATCH] Comps clarification

[seth vidal]

On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 14:48 -0500, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> Whilst looking at the new comps format and our current comps.xml we
> decided that there is potential ambiguity around how we do things for
> language support.
> 
> Let me give a walk through of the discussion and our thoughts:
> 
> Simple default - all good: <packagereq type="default">bg5ps</packagereq>
> 
> Default with requires - these were originally optional but changed to
> default to enforce being pulled in.  Both of those are really suboptimal
> and we really want them to be pulled in if the requirement is met on the
> system/in the tsInfo:
> 
> <packagereq type="default" requires="kdelibs">scim-qtimm</packagereq>
> <packagereq type="default"
> requires="openoffice.org-core">openoffice.org-langpack-zh_CN</packagereq>
> 

when did we start supporting requires as a attribute of packagereq?
I must have missed that patch going in.


-sv