[Rpm-metadata] two additional bits of data

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Fri Oct 31 18:35:57 UTC 2003


> The former, you mean?

yah. I did mean the former. Sorry.


> Build timestamps aren't referenced explicitly in debs, but all debs are
> required to have a changelog with change dates in standardized format.
> 
> If I were required to provide buildtime for debs, I'd use the changelog
> date.

I was thinking of wanting this metadata for something like 'recent'
packages listings.

-sv





More information about the Rpm-metadata mailing list