[Rpm-metadata] two additional bits of data
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Fri Oct 31 18:35:57 UTC 2003
> The former, you mean?
yah. I did mean the former. Sorry.
> Build timestamps aren't referenced explicitly in debs, but all debs are
> required to have a changelog with change dates in standardized format.
>
> If I were required to provide buildtime for debs, I'd use the changelog
> date.
I was thinking of wanting this metadata for something like 'recent'
packages listings.
-sv
More information about the Rpm-metadata
mailing list