[Rpm-metadata] One more thinko ...
Jeff Johnson
n3npq at nc.rr.com
Sun Oct 19 03:11:41 UTC 2003
seth vidal wrote:
>On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 20:39, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>This prolly doesn't parse (but I can't do XML in my head):
>>
>> <packager>Seth Vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu></packager>
>>
>>Hmmm, same deal in %changelog. When you get there, you might as well
>>canonicalize the convention of the EVR to which the entry applies. Sneaking
>>the EVR into e-mail address exploits the lack of grammar in spec files,
>>but that's an rpm,
>>not metadata, flaw. No way to stop the convention any more.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I don't think I understand this thinko at all.
>
><packager>Seth Vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu></packager> - is what
>the xml looks like.
>
>
Sorry, I'm looking at the display output, obviously tricked. Never mind.
>What's an EVR of an email address?
>
>
There is a convention, first invented by MDK, to add the EVR of the
package in
which the change first appeared. The EVR I refer to follows the e-mail
address in
%changelog. Examples:
* Mon Oct 13 2003 Jeff Johnson <jbj at jbj.org> 4.2.42-0.2
- resurrect db4-java.
* Sat Sep 20 2003 Jeff Johnson <jbj at jbj.org> 4.2.42-0.1
- update to 4.2.42.
- build in build_unix subdir.
- eliminate --enable-dump185, db_dump185.c no longer compiles for libdb*.
- create db4-tcl sub-pkg to isolate libtcl dependencies.
* Tue Jul 15 2003 Joe Orton <jorton at redhat.com> 4.1.25-7
- rebuild
73 de Jeff
More information about the Rpm-metadata
mailing list