[Rpm-metadata] xml update

[seth vidal]

> Then you better get your RFE for adding header extensions for P/E/S/R 
> tags mapped
> onto existing apt-rpm files today. All I need is someone to blame for 
> the request, I
> can/will have an implementation for you in Fedora by, say, Monday.

huh? I'm talking about this metadata format for this list - not for rpm.

Look if you want P/E/S/R you implement it. I didn't ask for it - I just
said we need a way to make sure we deal with packages that don't have
that information in their headers.

> There's also a need to stand back and look with jaundiced eye exactly 
> what has been
> suggested today. Bloat is like waist size, once you achieve, say, 36", 
> you can never ever
> fit into 32" pants again.

as adrian said yesterday on the rpm-python list - I'm lost by this
metaphor - is this good or bad? You suggested E/S/R.

-sv