[Rpm-metadata] xml update

[seth vidal]

> At the risk of upetting a fragile but developing consensus, I suggest 
> that all of
>      Obsoletes:
>      Conflicts:
>      Enhances:
>      Suggests:
>      Recommends:
>      Priority:
> be made common.
> 
> The risk is mainly with Obsoletes: and Conflicts: which may very well
> have subtle and incompatible semantics. I'll wave my hands and mumble
>      Implementation details.
> for the moment, as I do not believe there are serious incompatibilities.
> 
> The other 4 have no (current) rpm usage semantic, but might very well
> be useful for depsolvers. I'd suggest adopting the current Debian semantic
> exactly as is, after carefully thinking about how that semantic might be
> usefully implemented in rpm depsolvers. Clearly, apt-rpm already has
> an implementation that makes use of that information.


right - and red carpet has an implementation that makes use of licensing
information for presenting to the user for an agreement, iirc, that
doesn't mean that it should be in the common space.

More to the point I thought we had decided to focus on the basic
information that each tool REQUIRES to do their job to build the common
format, not taking the union of all things each depsolver/pkgmgmt
program uses.

-sv