[Rpm-metadata] two other areas needed

Paul Nasrat pauln at truemesh.com
Wed Oct 15 22:57:44 UTC 2003


On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:29:31PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:

> So does that work for others?
> It seemed like we got:
> name
> epoch
> ver
> rel
> arch

I assume that source/src is a special arch type? Or would source
packages go in there own specific 

> if so I'd like to get cracking on the code b/c I have a desire to work
> on using this for yum and dispense with headers asap.

Sounds good. Look forward to playing with.

Paul



More information about the Rpm-metadata mailing list