[Rpm-metadata] two other areas needed

[seth vidal]

>   I totally agree !


So does that work for others?
It seemed like we got:
name
epoch
ver
rel
arch
size
summary
checksum
description
location
url

in the common area
and for rpm:
deps
provides
obsoletes
conflicts
Buildhost
license
vendor
packager
color
group
header-range


and for debs:
deps - orentries
provides
suggests
recommends


right?

Does this work out for y'all? 
if so I'd like to get cracking on the code b/c I have a desire to work
on using this for yum and dispense with headers asap.

-sv