[Rpm-metadata] metadata script and sample
John R. Daily
jdaily at progeny.com
Sat Oct 4 04:52:15 UTC 2003
At (time_t)1065241052 seth vidal wrote:
>
> > Could the following fields be punted into an RPM specific namespace?
...
> > license
> Do debian packages not list the license?
No.
> > vendor
> an optional field even in rpms.
There is an "origin" header, rarely used in Debian, that I would assume
has similar semantics. This might as well stay.
> > BuildHost (presumably you meant build-host?)
> no - I think I meant buildhost - the system it was built on.
I'd suggest we leave that in the common namespace, as long as it's
optional; there's no reason Debian couldn't provide that for auto-built
packages.
> > url
> does debian not store a general url for the package?
Debian actually does have a url header, which like origin is rarely used.
This one probably should stay.
--
John R. Daily jdaily at progeny.com
Director of Technology Progeny Linux Systems
Master of the ephemeral epiphany
More information about the Rpm-metadata
mailing list