<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Does YUM (or portions of YUM) have to be re-built, or does this only require rebuilding the RPM binaries/shared objects, etc. ? <br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 11/13/09, Seth Vidal <i><skvidal@fedoraproject.org></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Seth Vidal <skvidal@fedoraproject.org><br>Subject: Re: [Yum] YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success<br>To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@lists.baseurl.org><br>Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 12:52 PM<br><br><div class="plainMail"><br><br>On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Joshua Burns wrote:<br><br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> The RPM version is 4.4.2.3 - I selected it primarily because it matches the version that is distributed with RHEL 5.x (we<br>> are using the standard vendor-supplied RPM with Linux).
Not really sure about patch level of RPM itself - I got the<br>> source from a tape archive directly from the development site. Is there a way I can tell by looking at the source files?<br>> <br>> Below is a capture of the truss(1) output from yum (first), then rpm(second).<br>> <br><br>okay - then you're missing a bunch of patches most likely.<br><br>Grab the srpm from rhel5.4 for rpm and check out all the patches that are applied.<br><br>Try those out on your solaris build - tell me if any of them make the difference. I SWEAR I remember this problem affecting something else.<br><br>-sv<br></div><br>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br><div class="plainMail">_______________________________________________<br>Yum mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Yum@lists.baseurl.org" href="/mc/compose?to=Yum@lists.baseurl.org">Yum@lists.baseurl.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum"
target="_blank">http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>