[Yum] Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread

[Joshua Burns]

That's a typo, sorry - #4 should read "4.7.1". Same problems/bug when using YUM (scriptlet failure). 

--- On Tue, 12/1/09, Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> wrote:

From: Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us>
Subject: Re: [Yum] Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
To: yum at lists.baseurl.org
Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 9:41 AM

On Monday 30 November 2009 04:29:24 pm Joshua Burns wrote:
> Hi - my apologies for the premature send.
> 
> After building versions
> 
> 1) 4.4.2.3 stock from dev site
> 2) 4.4.2.3-18 RHEL patches
> 3) 4.1.7 stock from dev site, and then finally
> 4) 5.1.9 from rpm5.org site
curious as to why you did not try 4.7 series that is in fedora. 

Dennis

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum at lists.baseurl.org
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum/attachments/20091201/cbd563f8/attachment.htm>