[Yum] Major bug in yum 2.4.1
Joshua Jensen
joshua at iwsp.com
Thu Dec 15 20:38:35 UTC 2005
I see a rather large problem with having the official yum site's newest
stable branch having a bug like this. "Already fixed in Fedora" is good
for Fedora, but setting users expectations that the yum website isn't
where we are supposed to get the non-broken yum packages would be a good
thing.
In lei of a 2.4.2 release, perhaps you could put a note in a README file
on http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/download/2.4/ saying "until 2.4.2
please use yum 2.4.1 from Fedora" ?
Joshua
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:44:15AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 10:35 -0500, Joshua Jensen wrote:
> > Any ETA on a version of yum 2.4 that fixes the current broken version?
> > What else are you waiting on for 2.4.2 ?
>
> <shrug>
>
> I never considered the metadata cleaning thing a major bug b/c 1. you
> can turn it off and 2. it will go away after a little while on its own
> b/c the cookie expires.
>
>
> What does anyone else think? make a 2.4.2 just for that bug?
>
> -sv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yum mailing list
> Yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
--
Joshua Jensen
joshua at iwsp.com
"If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"
More information about the Yum
mailing list