[Yum] RE: Yum Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13
Satish Kumar
satish.kumar at indscape.com
Mon Dec 12 20:34:01 UTC 2005
-----Original Message-----
From: yum-bounces at lists.dulug.duke.edu
[mailto:yum-bounces at lists.dulug.duke.edu]On Behalf Of
yum-request at lists.dulug.duke.edu
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 10:30 PM
To: yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
Subject: Yum Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13
Send Yum mailing list submissions to
yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
yum-request at lists.dulug.duke.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
yum-owner at lists.dulug.duke.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Yum digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. no module named yum (Jan Waszink)
2. yum error (alvin l lobiano)
3. Re: "yum list" shows only a few package (Brian Long)
4. Re: Yum error (Brian Long)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:24:14 +0100
From: Jan Waszink <j.waszink at law.uu.nl>
Subject: [Yum] no module named yum
To: yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
Message-ID: <1134253454.7806.7.camel at localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi there
I have problem installing yum 2.2, 2.3 or 2.4 under Fedora Core 2.
Installation seems to proceed well, both from the tar.gz package and
from the src.rps. However, when I try to start yum I keep getting the
error message No module named yum from Python, whatever way of
installing I try. I have followed the advice to use the src.rpm, but
this makes no difference. It happens with yum-2.2.2-1, 2.3.2-1, 2.4.0-1,
2.4.1-1 Apparently a file named yummodule.so is missing from
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/. I have also tried Python 2.4, without
effect.
What can I do to get it there? Is it possible simply to transplant
yummodule.so from another machine, and if so, where can I find a copy?
Thanks for all help,
Jan
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:25:29 +0000
From: alvin l lobiano <all-ndi at norkissumma.com>
Subject: [Yum] yum error
To: yum at linux.duke.edu
Message-ID: <1134357930.3531.1.camel at all>
Content-Type: text/plain
I was having a problem installing yum.
I think I have installed it properly but then I got this error message
There was a problem importing one of the Python modules
required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was:
No module named yum
Please install a package which provides this module, or
verify that the module is installed correctly.
It's possible that the above module doesn't match the
current version of Python, which is:
2.3.4 (#1, Feb 2 2005, 11:44:49)
[GCC 3.4.3 20041212 (Red Hat 3.4.3-9.EL4)]
If you cannot solve this problem yourself, please send this
message to <yum at lists.linux.duke.edu>.
thanks in advance...
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:47:08 -0500
From: Brian Long <brilong at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Yum] "yum list" shows only a few package
To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu>
Message-ID: <1134398828.4365.18.camel at brilong-lnx>
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 09:43 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On 12/11/05, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at laiskiainen.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Dec 2005, Jim Perrin wrote:
> > > O
> > >>> 1. I didn't know of any distros that were shipping an ia32e
kernel.
> > >>> Curious
> > >>
> > >> RHEL 3 has separate x86_64 and ia32e kernels...
> > >
> > > RHEL 3 ships with x86(ia32) kernels, and x86_64 kernels. not an
ia32e kernel.
> > >
> > > This would lead me to question why you have x86_64 packages on an
x86
> > > box, unless you're referring to EMT64 xeons as ia32e
> >
> > RHEL 3 x86_64 has both x86_64 and ia32e kernels. The ia32e one is
for
> > emt64, never mind the bizarre name...
> >
> > - Panu -
>
>
> Ah, that clears it all up. Haven't had a chance to play with them yet,
> but from what I've read/heard, I don't think I want to either.
Definitely underwhelming with regards to performance in comparison to a
similarly-configured Opteron-based system. :)
/Brian/
--
Brian Long | | |
IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||.
Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:18:22 -0500
From: Brian Long <brilong at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Yum] Yum error
To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu>
Message-ID: <1134404302.4365.25.camel at brilong-lnx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:45 -0700, Greg Knaddison wrote:
> On 12/9/05, Ken Ramey <kramey at lpl.arizona.edu> wrote:
> > Thanks for providing such a great tool to the user community.
> >
> > I am having a small problem on a new FC4 installation which was
recently
> > updated, using up2date. The error I am seeing is:
> >
>
> I recommend you use the recommendations in the FAQ on searching the
archives:
>
> http://wiki.linux.duke.edu/YumFaq
Has anyone updated the man page to reference the FAQ before this email
list? Maybe this would avoid so much repetition on the list.
2.4.0 has the following:
-----------------------
SEE ALSO
yum.conf (5)
http://linux.duke.edu/yum/
BUGS
There of course arenbt any bugs, but if you find any, they
should be sent to the mailing list: yum at lists.linux.duke.edu or
filed in bugzilla.
-----------------------
I wonder if the BUGS area should mention the FAQ before the mailing
list :)
/Brian/
--
Brian Long | | |
IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||.
Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
End of Yum Digest, Vol 29, Issue 13
***********************************
More information about the Yum
mailing list