[Yum] Possiable dependancy unresolution...
Greg Kurtzer
gmkurtzer at lbl.gov
Mon Sep 8 23:14:22 UTC 2003
Woops, I forgot that this was on one of my test boxes!!! Now why was I running
yum-2 on this...? Hrmm, pick one (your guess is as good as mine):
I have absolutely no recollection of this!
It was like that when I got here.
I thought your SPEC requires tag was a typo.
Just testing...
Sorry for raising the alarms,... Don't kill (me too much :)!
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:36:26PM -0400, seth vidal told me:
>
> NO NO NO NO,
>
> not a bug.
>
> I found it.
>
> you're using rhl 8.0.
>
> with rpm 4.1-1.06, right?
>
> that's not the right version for yum 2.0.2.
>
> rpm 4.1.1 not 4.1-1 for yum 2.0.2.
>
> rpm 4.1-1.06 didn't handle the ts.addInstall(hdr, 'a') mode at all - so
> no deps will ever resolve with that.
>
> in fact I thought the spec file for yum 2.x required rpm >= 4.1.1
>
> -sv
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yum mailing list
> Yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
--
Greg M. Kurtzer, CSE: Linux cluster specialist
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Contact: O=510.495.2307, P=510.448.4540, M=510.928.9953
1 Cyclotron Road #90-1116, Berkeley, CA 94720
http://www.lbl.gov, http://scs.lbl.gov/, http://lug.lbl.gov/
Email: GMKurtzer_at_lbl.gov, Text: 5109289953_at_mobileatt.net
More information about the Yum
mailing list