[Yum] man page question
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Thu Feb 6 17:52:18 UTC 2003
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 11:39, R P Herrold wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2003, seth vidal wrote:
> > <sheepish>
> > there is no assume-yes config directive.
> <smile> ... /me loves beta testing
beta! no way. I left that there on purpose :) I wanted to see who was
> It turns out to be a nice option in scripting for the yum.conf
> used to have ... I can swap around several options files, and
> have stuff 'just happen' downstream in my autobuilder more
> easilier <grin> ... [switch distro level, arch, archive, and
> behaviour, all in one fell swoop]
hehe. I was actually thinking which would be easier - add it to the
config options or remove it from the docs. Hard call :)
I'll add it to the list.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum/attachments/20030206/f9174780/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Yum