[Yum] error report -- latest tarball yum-20030203.tar.gz

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Thu Feb 6 15:13:05 UTC 2003

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 09:09, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi Seth,
> I think it's a good idea.  At some point you just have to diverge and go for 
> the python2 and rpm 4.2.  But I have one comment.
> When you do the breakoff, can you make it everything greater than 2.0 instead 
> of 1.0.  That way, at some point, you can actually have a 1.0 release for the 
> python 1.x. rpm 4.0x.
> I know that sounds trivial, but some people simply don't think a product is 
> usable until it hit's it's 1.0 release.  It's a mental thing I know, but it's 
> in alot of people's minds that way.
> You could also say then that the yum 1.0 goes with python 1, and yum 2.x goes 
> with python 2.

I think that's how it'll go. I considered 1.0 vs 1.2 but <shrug>

6 of one, half dozen of the other

Maybe I could start numbering towards more specific values of Pi

No, Wait. that's been done.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum/attachments/20030206/facecd05/attachment-0001.pgp 

More information about the Yum mailing list