[Yum] Re: install problem when same rpm in multiple repos
Tony Mountifield
tony at softins.clara.co.uk
Mon Dec 29 09:56:52 UTC 2003
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312290402270.5431-100000 at localhost.localdomain>,
Robert P. J. Day <yum at lists.dulug.duke.edu> wrote:
> # yum list "*ogle*"
> Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
> Server: Fedora 1 - Base
> Server: Fedora 1 - Stable
> Server: Fedora 1 - Testing
> Server: Fedora 1 - Unstable
> Server: Fedora 1 - Updates
> Server: Fedora 1 - Updates testing
> Server: Freshrpms 1 - Freshrpms
> Server: Freshrpms 1 - Testing Updates
> Server: Freshrpms 1 - Updates
> Server: Livna 1 - updates
> Finding updated packages
> Downloading needed headers
> Looking in Available Packages:
> Name Arch Version Repo
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ogle i386 0.9.2-1.1.fr freshrpms-freshrpms
> ogle i686 0.9.2-0.lvn.2.1 livna-updates
> ogle-devel i386 0.9.2-1.1.fr freshrpms-freshrpms
> ogle-devel i686 0.9.2-0.lvn.2.1 livna-updates
> ogle_gui i386 0.9.2-1.1.fr freshrpms-freshrpms
>
> Looking in Installed Packages:
> Name Arch Version Repo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> so while both freshrpms and livna claim to supply both ogle and
> ogle-devel, since i use a pkgpolicy of "newest", one would assume that i'd
> get the freshrpms versions in both cases. (i'm assuming that the
> comparison takes the build value into account, yes?)
Is it possible that yum was preferring arch==i686 over arch==i386 at a
higher precedence than the version number?
Cheers,
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
More information about the Yum
mailing list