[Yum] Patches to backport yum2
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Tue Dec 23 18:35:56 UTC 2003
> I have patched yum 2.0.x to work with older RedHat versions, specifically
> with rpm 4.0.4 and python 1.5.2. I've been working with the patched version
> for a couple of weeks, and no problems have arised, except that groups
> capabilities do not work (yet).
The groups are going to be very tricky b/c last I checked libxml2 and
python < 2.X don't get along.
> Besides some modifications due to python backport, which loses unicode support
> and some += shortcuts (at yum2-python1_backport.patch), most of the work on
> yum has been devoted to Rpm_Ts_Work class, which is modified to behave close to
> the TransactionSet class of rpm 4.2 which is the core of Rpm_Ts_Work itself.
The modifications to comps.py are slightly unhappy for the following
1. comps.py until this point was identical to comps.py from rhpl.
2. removing unicode support makes the alternate language possibilities
in the yumgroups.xml/comps.xml file limiting
As a possible workaround:
if you're running yum with python 1.5.X then a test is done and a the
groups options are removed, so they're never loaded.
> I have tested the patches against the new daily release (yum-20031222.tar.gz),
> making a minor change, and I send them attached (I've been using 2.0.4
> The order in which they are applied is
> although the first one is quite independent.
> At least on my case, it servers as perfect replacement of yum v1, and it might
> help to 'close' the old branch, which is probably not widely used. Any reports
> or opinions are wellcome.
I agree it would be nice to close yum v1 by combining the trees. I'm not
too happy about the comps.py modifications but there may be middle
A couple of problems: have you tested that after these have been applied
the tree still works on a fedora core 1 or rhl9 machine? It's not
obvious to me, so far, that they will. Also what about systems with
rpm404 instead of just rpm (like rhl 8.0)
More information about the Yum