[Yum] Couple of additional (tiny) feature requests

[seth vidal]

On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:51, Troy Dawson wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:11, Andrew Schretter wrote:
> > 
> >>Seth,
> >>   A couple of tiny additions would make things work smoother on some
> >>scripts I'm writing.
> >>
> >>yum info packagename
> >>
> >>does not report {arch} or {group}.  Can you possibly add these to the info
> >>page (at least arch).
> >>
> > 
> > Sure - that shouldn't be too bad at all.
> > 
> > 
> >>The other request is equally stupid, but I can't seem to get info out 
> >>of yum for the extras packages.
> >>
> >>If there is a package that comes up in :
> >>
> >>yum list extras
> >>
> >>then yum info packagename does not give info on it.
> > 
> > 
> > weird. that works for me.
> > 
> > -sv
> > 
> Me Too
> *Troy laugh's histerically*
> Oh sorry, just had to say that ... just that kind of a day.
> 
> Anyway, The yum info packagename works for me for an 'extra' package.
> Just thought I'd let ya know that it isn't just seth's machine that it's 
> working on.
> Troy
> 

its yum info extras that he wants to work - which is correct - it does
work :)

-sv

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum/attachments/20021018/755b5620/attachment-0001.pgp