[Yum-devel] [PATCH] 64 bit arm has landed upstream as aarch64 thats what the rpms will be change the support over to suit.

[Dennis Gilmore]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

El Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:19:37 +0300
Panu Matilainen <pmatilai at laiskiainen.org> escribió:
> On 09/11/2012 07:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > ---
> >   rpmUtils/arch.py | 6 ++----
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/rpmUtils/arch.py b/rpmUtils/arch.py
> > index d560be0..8a53f74 100644
> > --- a/rpmUtils/arch.py
> > +++ b/rpmUtils/arch.py
> > @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ arches = {
> >       "armv7hnl": "armv7hl",
> >       "armv7hl": "noarch",
> >
> > -    # arm64
> > -    "arm64": "noarch",
> > +    # aarch64
> > +    "aarch64": "noarch",
> 
> Hmm, which upstream would that be? At least a quick skim over Linus' 
> kernel tree didn't turn up any references to "aarch64" (or arm64 for 
> that matter).
> 
> A name is of course just a name and we might not have a whole lot say
> in it, but I can't help but thinking AARGH every time I see this
> mentioned...

well the patches have been submitted to linus. I tried but was unable
to convince them that arm64 was much better than aarch64 for the output
of uname -m  ill have some rpm patches soon also

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlBX2fwACgkQkSxm47BaWfccXACcDVEvOCDVgYr1pR/g+clR2Lut
kLwAnjgfFu1IfV6B8jUKOQKRgMZXmXdv
=JIvF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----