[Yum-devel] [PATCH] Big speed boost for depsolving "large" transactions.

[James Antill]

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 14:44 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, James Antill wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 00:12 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >> On Monday 02 November 2009, James Antill wrote:
> >>>  This follows on from the email I sent last week, about perf. notes on
> >>> loading prco data, specifically:
> >>>
> >>> """
> >>>  But I couldn't see anything that made a worthwhile difference. It's
> >>> possible some kind of "tsInfo local" PackageSack() would help, but maybe
> >>> something for another day...
> >>> """
> >>>
> >>> ...this implements that. [...]
> >>
> >> This commit seems to have broken the test suite (if I got it right from my
> >> first ever "git bisect" session, woo), there's a bunch of errors from
> >> simpleremovetests.SimpleRemoveTests like:
> >
> > Yeh, patch incoming which works around it the way the old code did ...
> > seems like it should be fixed in the test cases really though (could be
> > considered API, I guess).
> 
> did this patch ever get sent?

 Yeh, it was this one:

[Yum-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Fix for callers that rely on .pkgSackPackages
protecting .pkgSack.get*