[Yum-devel] 3.2

[James Bowes]

On Wed, 16 May 2007 23:24:21 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> We _could_ make it so that ayum can be None and that doSetup can take an
> ayum arg -- then, it wouldn't have to break API as old API users would
> be guaranteed to be calling YumBase.doRepoSetup() which can do the right
> thing; new callers would pass in the YumBase object to the constructor
> and then it would be fine accessing later.  But aiyee.

aiyee is right. I like how it is better than messing with a bunch of 
'if none:'s. We can always change it if something better comes up, right?

-James