[Yum-devel] 3.2.X and stuff to do

Jeremy Katz katzj at redhat.com
Thu May 3 02:39:47 UTC 2007


On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 22:23 -0400, James Bowes wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:53 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> >>   I was thinking some about 3.2.x and after. So a couple of options:
> > [snip]
> >> 2. don't branch, release 3.2.0 off of HEAD and continue working on HEAD
> >> but w/o breaking the API while we stabilize and work on new items.
> > 
> > So I've alluded to this some, but I really lean towards this option.
> 
> I was telling seth to branch for 3.2 earlier, but I really meant to tag
> it now, as I think we're stable enough for the release.
> 
> Working from head sounds fine, just as long as we (seth) are prepared to
> release a 3.2.x.y for some bug fix (or just patch the rpm in the spec.
> whatever.)

Nothing says we can't branch off of a release tag for a one off like
that..  the goal would be to not have a lot of those, though ;-)

Jeremy




More information about the Yum-devel mailing list