[Yum-devel] groupreq in yum-2.6?

seth vidal skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Sep 6 05:38:46 UTC 2006


On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 10:02 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 12:29 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:59 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 09:35 -0400, Brian Long wrote:
> > > So a couple of solutions:
> > > 
> > > 1. we add in a profile tag to the comps parsing that is just a way of
> > > collecting groups and is only used by yum. Not as tidy b/c it seems like
> > > it might be the wrong place for it.
> > 
> > Indeed, the more that I think about it I think that categories should be
> > moved outside of comps.xml too, both are site/distro specific and not
> > really core package grouping functionality.  They're together at the
> > moment mainly because of the historical relationship between anaconda
> > and comps.
> 
> Indeed, I'm coming to that conclusion too.  But that means there needs
> to be an easy way to extend what files are available in the repo
> metadata.  We want to be able to have, eg, <data type="grouphierarchy">
> (categories) and <data type="profiles"> (these uses of groupreq).  As
> well as anything else that someone may have a site-specific need for.
> And possibly the thing to do is having parsing for a few Well-Defined
> (tm) files in the yum/repomd base and allow adding new ones as x-foo,
> where the parsing for x-foo has to be done in the end app.
> 
> I think this could be a pretty elegant way to actually let repomd grow
> nicely into containing more information needed for system management
> while at the same time, not having yum itself grow out of control and
> trying to take over all aspects of system administration.
> 

bringing this back up as I go through and purge old email.

We now have a way of including extra and random metadata in the repo.

maybe shortly after 3.0 comes out it would be a good time to work on a
plugin or other adapter to try this.

-sv





More information about the Yum-devel mailing list