[Yum-devel] RFC: Package object comparison -- do we need a slight change?

Tim Lauridsen tim at rasmil.dk
Fri Oct 13 08:35:44 UTC 2006


seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 09:45 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>   
>> Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>>     
>>>>   
>>>>         
>>> My proposal is to remove the rich comparisons for package objects and 
>>> add an EVR property there return a compareable
>>> packageEVR object, there contain the rich comparisons for evr. (See 
>>> the attached patch)
>>>
>>> if po1 > po2: will have to be changed to
>>>
>>> if po1.EVR > po2.EVR:  # Everybody should be able to see what we are 
>>> comparing here.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> To much cut & paste, there is a new patch.
>>     
>
>
> yah - that's what we were talking about last night (or morning for you,
> or whatever)
>   
It was very early morning :-) .
> Right now I think that's the way we have to go and we need to sift
> through all the code  (yum-utils, too) and look for all places a po is
> compared for ver and fix it up.
>
>   
There should not be any problems with yum-utils, i have check all the 
recent patches to yum-utils there have not been added any po compare stuff.

Tim


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/attachments/20061013/e1f30227/attachment.htm 


More information about the Yum-devel mailing list