skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Wed Aug 24 17:11:52 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 18:55 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:23 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > Done. Didn't branch yet as I started wondering what should the branch be
> > > called - yum_utils-0_3 or should the branch reflect the fact that it's for
> > > yum 2.4.x?
> > I think we should always have a tag based on the name of the release of
> > yum-utils
> > so yum-utils-0-3 for a tag
> > and for branches I think they should go with the version of yum that it
> > works with.
> > so the branch name can be yum-2_4_X
> > cool?
> Sounds sane to me - tagged and branched as per above.
You rock. Wanna make the release?
More information about the Yum-devel