pmatilai at laiskiainen.org
Wed Aug 24 15:55:58 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:23 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > Done. Didn't branch yet as I started wondering what should the branch be
> > called - yum_utils-0_3 or should the branch reflect the fact that it's for
> > yum 2.4.x?
> I think we should always have a tag based on the name of the release of
> so yum-utils-0-3 for a tag
> and for branches I think they should go with the version of yum that it
> works with.
> so the branch name can be yum-2_4_X
Sounds sane to me - tagged and branched as per above.
- Panu -
More information about the Yum-devel