[Yum-devel] check_timestamp, perhaps total reget bug in 2.9.6.
scott at quadhome.com
Thu Aug 18 04:48:06 UTC 2005
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:42:12PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 07:39:09PM -0700, Michael Stenner wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 07:05:37PM -0700, Scott Robinson wrote:
> > > Does this mean reget is broken, or am I just using it wrong?
> > It's a bug. I think I stumbled on it before, but clearly I forgot or
> > something. The issue is that urlgrabber tries to fetch from the end
> > of the local file to the end of the remote file, which is
> > zero-length. IIRC, that is (sadly) not legal in HTTP. I'll look into
> > it. I'm currently doing a bunch of stuff in urlgrabber and expect a
> > new release Real Soon Now. This will be fixed one way or the other.
> Would it be out of line to catch the out of range exception, but still
> check the timestamp headers? (Are they passed along in the 216?)
After further investigation, I realize the timestamp headers are not
http://quadhome.com/ - Personal webpage
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/attachments/20050817/49164080/attachment.pgp
More information about the Yum-devel